Craft distilleries can now ship spirits directly to California consumers
A one-year pilot starting January 1, 2026 allows craft distilleries to ship spirits directly to consumers.

California opened its first direct-to-consumer spirits shipping channel on January 1, 2026, when Governor Newsom's AB 1246 took effect. For the first time, craft distilleries—both based in California and operating elsewhere—can ship spirits directly to consumers who order online, bypassing the traditional wholesale network that has governed spirits sales since Prohibition ended in 1933. The law establishes a one-year pilot program running through December 31, 2026, allowing the state to test whether direct shipping works without disrupting existing distribution channels or undercutting retailers. Wine producers already enjoyed direct shipping rights; beer followed. Spirits, the final major category of alcohol, now joins them—but only under strict conditions that expose how differently California regulates each category.
The shift matters because traditional spirits distribution requires producers to sell through wholesalers, who sell to retailers, taking markup at each step. This three-tier system, established after Prohibition to prevent monopolistic control by single producers, stacks costs dramatically. By the time a bottle reaches retail shelves, consumers pay roughly 150 percent or more in markup compared to the initial manufacturing price—in some cases, tripling the original cost. Direct shipping eliminates that chain, lowering prices for consumers and raising revenue for small distillers. But the law imposes strict limits designed to prevent mass production and out-of-state operations from flooding California's market.
How the three-tier system works, and why it matters
California's three-tier alcohol distribution system separates the industry into three components: producers (distilleries, breweries, wineries, and importers), wholesalers (state-licensed intermediaries that buy from producers and handle logistics), and retailers (bars, restaurants, liquor stores, and online sellers) who sell to consumers. Created after Prohibition's 1933 repeal, the system aims to prevent vertical integration—single ownership across production, distribution, and retail—while creating what the industry calls "checks and balances with the intention of leveling the playing field."
The system imposes costs at every tier. Wholesalers purchase from producers at approximately a 50 percent markup, then add their own margins when selling to retailers, who add theirs when selling to consumers. The cumulative effect is dramatic: a $10 bottle at the distillery might retail for $25 to $35 by the time it reaches a consumer's hands. Small distilleries with limited production face a particular disadvantage. They cannot negotiate the volume discounts that large producers secure, so their products carry higher wholesale costs. Direct shipping bypasses two tiers entirely, letting distilleries pocket the margins wholesalers and retailers would otherwise claim and offering consumers lower prices.
California is classified as an "open state," meaning private sector companies handle distribution rather than state government. But the three-tier system still governs the process. Wine already has an exception: California wineries can obtain a Type 82 Direct Shipper Permit, paying a $120 one-time application fee and $30 annually, to ship directly to consumers without quantity limits. Beer followed with its own direct shipping rights. AB 1246 extends this privilege to spirits for the first time, but with restrictions wine and beer do not face.
Who qualifies
Only craft distilleries can participate under AB 1246. California defines a craft distiller by two criteria: annual production cannot exceed 150,000 gallons of distilled spirits per fiscal year, and the distillery must manufacture at least 65 percent of the spirits it sells in-house. Out-of-state distilleries that meet these standards can apply for a California permit; so can California-licensed craft distilleries.
Large commercial operations are barred entirely. A distillery producing 151,000 gallons annually cannot use AB 1246, even if it otherwise meets the requirements. The 65-percent self-manufacturing rule blocks operations that simply bottle and rebrand spirits produced elsewhere—a common practice known as non-distillery producers. This threshold ensures that only distilleries actually making their own product can participate. The restriction reflects California lawmakers' intent to support small, local producers rather than opening the door to any entity calling itself a distillery.
The 150,000-gallon cap is not arbitrary. For context, nationally only nine states permit any form of direct-to-consumer spirits shipping. The wine industry, by contrast, operates with no volume limits in California. The more restrictive spirits threshold suggests lawmakers were cautious about disrupting the existing spirits wholesale market, which larger producers dominate through established distribution networks.
The shipping rules: limits that distinguish spirits from wine
Each distillery can ship no more than 2.25 liters—about three standard 750-milliliter bottles—to any single consumer per day. This is the most restrictive rule in the law. The statute treats each transaction as a separate shipment, so a distillery cannot combine two 1-liter orders into a single 2.25-liter shipment to the same person on the same day. If a consumer wants to order more spirits, they must wait until the next calendar day. Wine shippers face no such daily limit; they can ship multiple cases to the same consumer on the same day as long as state and local laws permit.
All shipments require the recipient to be at least 21 years old and to sign for the delivery. Common carriers—UPS, FedEx, or similar services—handle the actual delivery and collect the adult signature. Leaving spirits on a doorstep, as with a package delivery, is prohibited. Every container must display the label: "CONTAINS ALCOHOL: SIGNATURE OF PERSON AGE 21 YEARS OR OLDER REQUIRED FOR DELIVERY." Separately, all bottles must comply with California's bottle recycling program, which requires prominent labeling of the California Redemption Value (CRV) deposit.
The 2.25-liter daily cap has proven contentious. Industry advocates note that it allows consumers to order just three bottles at once, making the economics of direct shipping marginal for distilleries paying common carrier fees. However, lawmakers set the limit lower than wine's unrestricted volumes because they wanted to prevent what they viewed as potential abuse—the risk that a single consumer or proxy buyer could accumulate large quantities intended for resale, undermining the wholesale network. The daily limit is a compromise, allowing direct shipping while capping the volume that passes outside traditional channels.
The business case: who benefits and who may suffer
California's craft distilling industry is small but growing. Survey data released during the legislative debate revealed substantial consumer enthusiasm for direct spirits shipping. Approximately 85 percent of regular craft spirits drinkers support expanded direct-to-consumer access. More importantly, 92 percent said that if they purchased spirits via direct-to-consumer shipping and tried something, they were "more apt to look for it at retail." This finding challenges the fear that direct shipping cannibalizes traditional retail sales; instead, it may amplify them by introducing consumers to products they later seek in stores.
For California's smallest distilleries, the program is a lifeline. Arthur Hartunian, whose company depends on direct-to-consumer shipping for 99 percent of its sales, advocated for the law during legislative hearings. Before AB 1246, his business relied on temporary permissions that threatened to expire, leaving small distillers vulnerable to sudden loss of their primary revenue channel. The law substantially increases daily onsite purchase limits for craft distilleries (from 2.25 to 4.5 liters per consumer per day) and now enables interstate shipping, providing crucial revenue stability.
Retailers and wholesalers expressed concerns during the legislative process about losing market share to direct shipping. However, industry data suggests the threat is modest given the 2.25-liter daily cap and the fact that survey respondents said direct purchases increased their interest in finding products at retail. Hartunian and others warned that the law should apply reciprocally: if California distilleries can ship out-of-state, out-of-state distilleries should face the same restrictions when shipping into California. That reciprocal protection is not yet written into law, potentially disadvantaging local producers.
“A $10 bottle at the distillery might retail for $25 to $35 by the time it reaches a consumer's hands through the traditional three-tier system.”
Getting a permit and complying with taxes
Distilleries must obtain a Distilled Spirits Direct Shipper Permit from California's Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The application fee is $125, and the annual permit fee matches the cost of a Type 82 direct shipper permit—$100 application fee and $10 annual renewal, the same fees required for wine shippers. Out-of-state distilleries must provide documentation of their home-state production license proving they are legally operating and hold the requisite spirits production permit in their state of origin.
The state expected to accept applications starting in mid-December 2025, though processing times can extend into early 2026. Distilleries must also register with California's Department of Tax and Fee Administration to collect and remit sales and excise taxes on their shipments. Direct shipping to consumers triggers California sales tax. The state rate is 7.25 percent, with local rates ranging from 0 to 3.25 percent, for a statewide range of 7.25 to 10.5 percent. Out-of-state distilleries shipping across state lines should understand that California taxes still apply to their sales.
Shippers must track every shipment and maintain records available for state audits. Both California and out-of-state distilleries must file annual reports with the ABC detailing the total volume of spirits shipped into the state during the prior year. These reports are due by January 1 of the following year. The reporting requirement serves two purposes: it allows the state to monitor compliance with the 2.25-liter daily cap and the 150,000-gallon annual production limit, and it provides data for lawmakers to assess whether the pilot program should continue.
The one-year pilot and what comes next
AB 1246 is explicitly a pilot program, scheduled to expire on December 31, 2026. California has used sunset clauses before to test novel alcohol policies. The one-year window gives lawmakers and the industry time to gather data on three critical questions: whether the direct shipping channel disrupts existing retail networks, whether violations occur that the state's compliance monitoring does not catch, and whether the model actually works for both producers and consumers given the restrictions.
The precedent comes from wine. Following the 2005 Supreme Court decision in Granholm v. Heald, which found state bans on out-of-state wine shipments unconstitutional, California permitted direct wine shipping. Today, wine is widely shipped across state lines with minimal observed disruption to wholesalers or retailers. Industry experts have speculated that if the spirits pilot succeeds, California's action could trigger similar direct-to-consumer shipping expansions nationwide, just as the wine ruling did. Currently, only nine states allow any direct-to-consumer spirits shipping, suggesting that California's experiment may reshape national policy.
Both California lawmakers and the spirits industry will examine the pilot's results before deciding whether to make it permanent, extend it, expand it to larger distilleries, or allow it to lapse. Retailers and wholesalers will watch the data closely. Distillers will advocate for permanent status and for the 2.25-liter cap to increase if the pilot shows no harm to traditional channels. The one-year period provides all stakeholders—producers, wholesalers, retailers, state regulators, and consumers—time to evaluate whether direct spirits shipping belongs alongside wine and beer as a permanent feature of California's alcohol distribution system.



