Skip to main content

Who can use the FDA's U.S. Caught Seafood label is unclear

The FDA's voluntary U.S. Caught Seafood label is meant to show where seafood was caught. Its eligibility rules, enforcement and in-store appearance are unclear.

Editorial Staff

· 5 min read

Blue and white trawler with a crane and red buoys moves across calm water, leaving a wake behind it
Blue and white trawler with a crane and red buoys moves across calm water, leaving a wake behind it

The Food and Drug Administration has proposed a voluntary label for seafood caught by American fishermen. The label is called U.S. Caught Seafood. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced it on Friday, Oct. 23, 2026, at a political rally in Fort Myers, Florida, where he appeared with President Donald Trump, according to Reuters.

The label was released alongside the America First Seafood Strategy and a federal seafood website, Seafood.gov. The White House lists the label as one step in the same announcement. Several practical questions remain open, including who qualifies and how the label would appear in stores. The sections below cover the purpose, status, rules and wider measures announced alongside it.

What the label is meant to show

The White House describes the label as a way for consumers to identify seafood “caught and harvested by American fishermen.” The stated purpose is origin. Reuters reports that the label is meant to help inform people’s choice about where the goods come from.

The status is described differently. The White House says that beginning Oct. 23 the FDA is proposing a voluntary label. Reuters describes the label as proposed by the FDA and says the United States would introduce it. YourNews, citing The Hill, reports that the FDA began offering the label that Friday. The sources therefore differ on whether the label is already on offer or is still at the proposal stage.

The White House says the label is available for download on Seafood.gov. It describes the site as a one-stop destination for U.S. fishermen and consumers, with information on federal seafood initiatives and on science- and health-based reasons to choose American seafood. YourNews describes Seafood.gov as a central resource for consumers, businesses and seafood producers.

Why the label is voluntary and what it sits beside

The White House says the label is voluntary. YourNews reports that it is not a new blanket requirement for seafood sold in the United States, and that producers choose whether to use the designation. Because use is voluntary, which producers use the label depends on their own choices.

The label sits alongside existing federal rules rather than replacing them. YourNews reports that the FDA already regulates seafood safety and labeling under federal food laws, while the USDA and other agencies oversee seafood marketing, inspections and trade. According to the same report, officials say the label complements existing seafood labeling requirements and gives U.S. operations another way to distinguish their products.

YourNews also quotes Kennedy, per an HHS announcement, as saying that American families want to know where their food comes from. The administration presents the label as a way to show consumers which products are domestic and which are imports.

Who qualifies, and what producers would claim

The sources describe eligibility in different terms. The White House describes the label in terms of seafood caught by American fishermen. YourNews says “qualifying seafood producers” may identify their products as domestically caught.

Producers who use the label must ensure their products meet the applicable criteria and that their origin claims are accurate, according to YourNews. Criteria for qualifying are unclear, and the steps a producer would take to document a catch are unclear.

For a buyer, the label would be a producer’s own statement about where the seafood was caught, and the producer must be able to stand behind it. How any such claim would be verified is unclear.

Where the label could appear in stores and abroad

The White House says the label can be downloaded, but where it would appear on packaging or menus is unclear. Whether retailers and food sellers would adopt it is also unclear.

Because use is voluntary, the mix of labeled and unlabeled seafood on shelves and menus would depend on which producers choose the label. The label’s stated purpose is origin, and its effect on menus is unclear.

Overseas, the White House says the label is meant to help consumers around the world identify American-caught seafood. The strategy also seeks expanded market access for American seafood abroad. How the label would work for overseas buyers is unclear, so the aim is stated but the process is not.

“The label’s stated purpose is origin, and its effect on menus is unclear.”

Import competition, short weights and processing capacity

The White House says the strategy protects domestic fishermen from unfair competition through import certification and compliance, regulatory reform, industry partnerships and expanded market access abroad. It cites illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, mislabeled imports and heavily subsidized foreign seafood as harming U.S. businesses. It describes the subsidized foreign seafood as produced under weak labor, environmental and safety standards. How the import certification steps would work is unclear.

YourNews reports that domestic producers face competition from imported fish and shellfish, including products processed overseas or sold at lower prices. It also reports that the strategy addresses short-weighted seafood, where excess water or ice can increase the apparent weight of a product. Regulators want stronger oversight, particularly of imported products, to enforce net-weight and labeling rules. YourNews quotes Kennedy, per an HHS announcement, as saying the FDA is cracking down on short-weighted imports. Specific enforcement steps and penalties are unclear.

On processing, the White House says permitting barriers to private investment in working waterfronts, cold storage and shoreside facilities have led to significant loss in U.S. seafood processing capacity. It says processing jobs are the primary income source for hundreds of rural Alaska communities. The strategy aims to restore the profitability of U.S. fishermen, especially Maine lobster fisheries.

The 2025 order behind the strategy, and the loan program

The America First Seafood Strategy traces back to an executive order signed on April 17, 2025, titled Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness. The order establishes the strategy to boost U.S. seafood production, sales and exports. The White House’s 2025 fact sheet says the U.S. imports nearly 90% of its seafood, runs a trade deficit exceeding $20 billion, and controls over four million square miles of prime fishing grounds.

According to a summary by the law firm Cassidy Levy Kent, the order gave the Commerce Secretary 30 days to consider suspending, revising or rescinding regulations that burden commercial fishing, aquaculture and fish processing. It set a 60-day deadline for Commerce, the U.S. Trade Representative and an Interagency Seafood Trade Task Force to assess seafood competitiveness and develop a trade strategy. The order also directs Commerce to consider improving the Seafood Import Monitoring Program to target high-risk shipments.

The White House says marine national monument proclamations in April 2025, February 2026 and June 2026 restored commercial fishing access in Atlantic and Pacific waters, covering hundreds of thousands of square miles.

The White House says the administration is making more than $5 billion in USDA guaranteed loans available to expand modernized meat and seafood processing. It says USDA launched the Office of Seafood in April 2026 to help the industry navigate access to USDA programs and support. Loan terms and eligibility are unclear. The label is one of several measures in the same announcement, alongside the loans, the Office of Seafood, Seafood.gov and the import measures.

Related

Cover story

RJ Scaringe

RJ Scaringe's Road to Profit Runs Through the Rivian R2. Can He Close the Gap With Tesla?